PDA

View Full Version : US - Prison Stats - WOW


Cherub
February 29th, 2008, 1:01 am
Report: 1 percent of U.S. adults behind bars


NEW YORK (AP) -- For the first time in history, more than one in every 100 American adults is in jail or prison, according to a new report.
http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/2008/CRIME/02/28/prison.population.ap/art.prison.gi.jpgSan Quentin State Prison in California holds more than 5,200 inmates.


http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/.element/img/2.0/mosaic/base_skins/baseplate/corner_wire_BL.gif


The report, released Thursday by the Pew Center on the States, said the 50 states spent more than $49 billion on corrections last year, up from less than $11 billion 20 years earlier. The rate of increase for prison costs was six times greater than for higher education spending, the report said.
Using updated state-by-state data, the report said 2,319,258 adults were held in U.S. prisons or jails at the start of 2008 -- one out of every 99.1 adults, and more than any other country in the world.
The steadily growing inmate population "is saddling cash-strapped states with soaring costs they can ill afford and failing to have a clear impact either on recidivism or overall crime," the report said.
Susan Urahn, managing director of the Pew Center on the States, said budget woes are prompting officials in many states to consider new, cost-saving corrections policies that might have been shunned in the recent past for fear of appearing soft in crime.
"We're seeing more and more states being creative because of tight budgets," she said in an interview. "They want to be tough on crime, they want to be a law-and-order state -- but they also want to save money, and they want to be effective."
The report cited Kansas and Texas as states which have acted decisively to slow the growth of their inmate population. Their actions include greater use of community supervision for low-risk offenders and employing sanctions other than reimprisonment for ex-offenders who commit technical violations of parole and probation rules.
"The new approach, born of bipartisan leadership, is allowing the two states to ensure they have enough prison beds for violent offenders while helping less dangerous lawbreakers become productive, taxpaying citizens," the report said.
Don't Miss
Prison stabbing ends violent life (http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/02/22/notorious.inmate.ap/index.htm)While many state governments have shown bipartisan interest in curbing prison growth, there also are persistent calls to proceed cautiously.
"We need to be smarter," said David Muhlhausen, a criminal justice expert with the conservative Heritage Foundation. "We're not incarcerating all the people who commit serious crimes -- but we're also probably incarcerating people who don't need to be."
According to the report, the inmate population increased last year in 36 states and the federal prison system.
The largest percentage increase -- 12 percent -- was in Kentucky, where Gov. Steve Beshear highlighted the cost of corrections in his budget speech last month. He noted that the state's crime rate had increased only about 3 percent in the past 30 years, while the state's inmate population has increased by 600 percent.
The Pew report was compiled by the Center on the State's Public Safety Performance Project, which is working directly with 13 states on developing programs to divert offenders from prison without jeopardizing public safety.
"For all the money spent on corrections today, there hasn't been a clear and convincing return for public safety," said the project's director, Adam Gelb. "More and more states are beginning to rethink their reliance on prisons for lower-level offenders and finding strategies that are tough on crime without being so tough on taxpayers."
The report said prison growth and higher incarceration rates do not reflect a parallel increase in crime or in the nation's overall population. Instead, it said, more people are behind bars mainly because of tough sentencing measures, such as "three-strikes" laws, that result in longer prison (http://topics.cnn.com/topics/prisons) stays.
"For some groups, the incarceration numbers are especially startling," the report said. "While one in 30 men between the ages of 20 and 34 is behind bars, for black males in that age group the figure is one in nine."
The nationwide figures, as of January 1, include 1,596,127 people in state and federal prisons and 723,131 in local jails -- a total 2,319,258 out of almost 230 million American adults.
The report said the United States is the world's incarceration leader, far ahead of more populous China with 1.5 million people behind bars. It said the U.S. also is the leader in inmates per capita (750 per 100,000 people), ahead of Russia (628 per 100,000) and other former Soviet bloc nations which make up the rest of the Top 10.

Cherub
February 29th, 2008, 1:02 am
Today it's been reported that the United States now has the highest prison population in the world

It was stated that 1 in 100 people in this country are in jail

And that every year in this country $50 billion dollars is spent on all of these ciminals

Those numbers are shocking and a bit scarey

At this rate what's it going to be like in another 5 or 10 years and at what cost

In Michigan alone the gov. wants to close prisons and let criminals out early

So, is this the best solution states can come up with is let these criminals out early?

Do you have any idea's as to what can be done to slow the rate of people going into prison?

If so, what?

Without question something has to be done

Aimee Lee
February 29th, 2008, 9:50 am
I can think of one, eliminate the War on Drugs.
I don't do drugs except alcohol and caffine so don't think I have an angle.
Or wait I do have an angle I think drugs are the least of our worries.
It's funny to me that when things become legal people become disinterested, see Amsterdam.
I think our prisons are packed with people who are perpetrators of non-violent crime.
I always thought the purpose of going to prison had to do with protecting the public.
How are we protecting the public when a non-violent drug dealer gets life in prison and a pervert sexual predator gets 15 years? I just don't get it.
Oh well doesn't matter what I say I won't be going to prison anytime soon. And what I think isn't going to change anything except fall on deaf ears.

LPTaxpayer
February 29th, 2008, 1:09 pm
Another one: Those with lesser felony charges...make they "work" for their punishment. When they don't work, not only do they fill up our prisons...the taxpayers' foot more and more bills.

Harrison
February 29th, 2008, 2:38 pm
Excellent suggestions.

squishie
March 2nd, 2008, 12:41 am
I suppose there are no "easy answers" to this on going dilema. But releasing many of these people back into society is definelty not the answer I hope they settle on. They need to make prisons more self sufficent and have the prisoners do the work to cut back on what the taxpayers are having to kick in. Make them grow and raise their food, and if there is any surplus have them donate it to the needy (there are plenty out there). Cut out luxeries like nice work out equipment and cable. Create jobs in the prison ssytem creating products that can be sold to offset the prison costs.(think replacing some of the made in china products for made in prison products)
And quite frankly prehaps someone should be rethinking housing some serial killer, rapist or child predator for the rest of their lives...now please dont bash me for thinking I am pro death penalty, but lets face it the humane society wont keep doggies and kitties for the rest of their natural lives if they cant be placed back into society.
Just my opinion for what its worth.

Harrison
March 2nd, 2008, 4:03 pm
Squishie,

I am definitely FOR the death penalty and I don't care what anyone thinks of me for saying that. The problem that I have with the states that HAVE the death penalty is that it takes 20-30 years before they actually execute someone. In the meantime, we are feeding them, clothing them, sometimes paying college tuition for them, providing them medical, dental, and vision care, and sometimes, geriatric care.

I understand that there will always be a few people who are executed that were not guilty of the crime they were sentenced for because I believe nothing is one hundred percent foolproof, but after maybe five years, they should be put to death.

As for the rest of the prison population, frankly, I am tired of people having no consequences for their actions. I wholeheartedly agree with Aimee's assessment that the punishment is definitely UNbalanced. The only suggestion that I can make is to make your voice heard to the lawmakers that set these standards.

Harrison