EMUJeff
June 13th, 2008, 2:28 pm
Here is the article. http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/06/13/1138296.aspx
I will leave it to you to read the whole thing. I do not feel right about quoting only sections, as that could seem partisan.
Especially interesting to me, though, is the focus on the number three's and how frequently we keep getting them. Maybe so it will seem like we are trying? I don't know.
If they really wanted to find bin Laden I know where they could find over 140,000 troops to do so.
It is sufficient to say that either we don't want to catch him or he's better than we think and all the Abu Gahrib's and Guantanamo's haven't yeilded much but the anamosity of the world and damaged our reputation as a just nation. IMO.
EMUJeff
I will leave it to you to read the whole thing. I do not feel right about quoting only sections, as that could seem partisan.
Especially interesting to me, though, is the focus on the number three's and how frequently we keep getting them. Maybe so it will seem like we are trying? I don't know.
If they really wanted to find bin Laden I know where they could find over 140,000 troops to do so.
It is sufficient to say that either we don't want to catch him or he's better than we think and all the Abu Gahrib's and Guantanamo's haven't yeilded much but the anamosity of the world and damaged our reputation as a just nation. IMO.
EMUJeff